|
Below Basic (Grade: D/F) |
Basic (Grade: C) |
Proficient (Grade: B) |
Advanced (Grade: A) |
Thesis |
Paper lacks focus and/or a discernible thesis; shows minimal engagement with the topic; fails to state and adequately support an argument |
Some intelligible ideas, but thesis is weak, unclear, or too broad - presents several possible theses in the first paragraph, and fails to identify which one will be supported in subsequent paragraphs; offers basic observations |
Identifiable thesis representing adequate understanding of the assigned topic; offers some insight; presents and defends a thoughtful argument; recognizes multiple dimensions and/or perspectives |
Clear, focused thesis representing full understanding of the assignment; presents and defends an excellent argument; recognizes multiple dimensions and/or perspectives with elaboration and depth; offers considerable insight |
Evidence |
Indicates lack of familiarity with ancient evidence* and secondary literature |
Indicates some familiarity with ancient evidence* and secondary literature, but not enough to develop argument in unified way; evidence may be inaccurate, irrelevant, or inappropriate for the purpose of the essay |
Indicates familiarity with ancient evidence* and secondary literature; evidence and secondary literature well documented and relevant, but very occasionally not complete, well integrated, and/or appropriate for the purpose of the essay; reflects ability to critically assess evidence |
Indicates excellent grasp of ancient evidence* and secondary literature; evidence and secondary literature are relevant, accurate, complete, well integrated, well documented, and appropriate for the purpose of the essay; reflects ability to critically assess evidence in a sophisticated manner |
Documentation |
Little to no documentation |
Basic but occasionally not professionally appropriate documentation; some extraneous documentation |
Documentation is appropriate; no extraneous documentation |
Professionally appropriate documentation |
Organization |
No coherence both overall and within paragraphs; introduction and conclusion lacking or illogical |
Organization, overall and/or within paragraphs, occasionally lacking in coherence; few evident transitions; introduction and conclusion may lack logic |
Few organizational problems on any of the 3 levels (overall, paragraph, transitions); introduction and conclusion are effectively related to the whole |
Organization is logical and appropriate to assignment; paragraphs are well-developed and appropriately divided; ideas linked with effective transitions; introduction and conclusion are effectively related to the whole |
Style and Mechanics |
Multiple and serious errors of sentence structure and grammar; frequent errors in spelling and capitalization; intrusive and/or inaccurate punctuation such that communication is hindered; lack of proper format for text and documentation; proofreading not evident; a “D” paper may become a “F” paper if mechanical errors garble its message |
Occasional errors of sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, spelling and/or capitalization; careful proofreading not evident; somewhat sloppy in terms of text and documentation format; a “C” paper may become a “D” paper if mechanical errors garble its message |
Effective and varied sentences; virtually no errors in sentence construction, punctuation, spelling and/or capitalization; proper format for text and documentation |
Sentences structured effectively; well-chosen variety of sentence styles and length; free of punctuation, spelling, capitalization errors; proper format for text and documentation |
*ancient evidence: Latin or Greek textual, archaeological, art historical, numismatic, epigraphical