Unit paper guidelines
Unit 1—Why has science (particularly)
flourished in the West?
History of Science
due: Thursday, 18 September
Turn in your paper at
the beginning of class. See the syllabus “policies” section for information
about late assignments.
grading information: This
paper is worth 10% of your grade.
further instructions:
- See the syllabus “assignments”
section for important information about what constitutes a good paper and
what materials and services you may use when writing your essay.
- Write a 3-page paper answering
the question that entitles the unit we have just finished. (The question is
reproduced at the top of the page.) If you must, you may write up to four
pages, but your essay should be tightly argued. You may not write
less than 3 pages.
- Use 12-point Times New
Roman, one-inch margins, and double-spacing. Proofread your paper carefully
before turning it in, as it is very difficult to evaluate the content of your
essay when it’s shrouded in grammatical and spelling errors.
- As noted in the syllabus,
I encourage you to take your essay to the Debby Ellis Writing
Center—just
realize that the consultants there will discuss your writing with you; they
are not grammar and spelling checkers.
- Your essay should have
a clearly stated and supportable thesis that appears toward the beginning
of the paper. Do not try to address every aspect of the question. Rather,
in your introduction, define one aspect of this question you want to discuss,
and state a clear thesis (main argument) within that specific framework.
- You should include a conclusion
that makes clear how the particular arguments and evidence in the body of
the paper ultimately led you to believe your paper’s thesis to be true.
- Back up your arguments
frequently with specific evidence, and always cite that evidence appropriately.
- Above all, make this
material your own. What good is knowledge if you don’t make it yours?
In other words, don’t simply parrot back to me what our authors say,
or what I’ve said in class (though of course you should expend some effort
in your paper making clear what their arguments are). Your essay should
demonstrate that you have thought through these arguments yourself, and
have come up with your own educated views on them. In short, your paper should
be neither regurgitation of the course texts nor pure speculation. It should
reflect your informed views based on a careful reading of those texts.
answering this unit question:
- Your essay must address why European sciences flourished after the
16th century, and why not Chinese or Islamic sciences. (Obviously,
when you get to your discussion of why not China or the Islamic world, you
will want to spend more time discussing China, since we have more direct
material on the issue of why the Chinese did not independently develop modern
science.)
- Your essay must contain
a critical examination of Needham, Sivin, and/or Long.